California Remains a Privacy Bellwether
Hello all, and happy Thursday!Read Now
August 17, 2023
Hello all, and happy Thursday!
Several of our stories this week focus on generative AI and the technology’s data protection implications.
The explosion in generative AI technologies may have felt sudden, but technology grows at an exponential rate. If anything, this is just the beginning.
What stands out to me is the timing of this explosion in AI technology. Had it happened just a few years earlier, the regulatory landscape would be lightyears behind the data privacy implications of AI—possibly so far behind, it might never have been able to catch up.
What would today’s AI solutions look like with unfettered access to the world’s personal data? More advanced? Probably. More invasive? There’s no need to speculate on that point—we can just look at examples of AI firms that pushed the envelope too far, like Clearview AI.
We all know that the genie doesn’t go back in the bottle. So, if you care about data privacy, let’s be thankful that data privacy regulations came into the world before this most recent uptick in AI tech.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently announced its support of S.B. 362, authored by California State Senator Josh Becker. S.B. 362, also known as the California Delete Act, would allow people to easily and efficiently make one request to delete their personal information held by all data brokers registered in California.
Although the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) encourages data protection authorities (DPAs) to consider each GDPR breach on a case-by-case basis, it also provides guidance on how fines and penalties should be calculated. The five-step process is laid out in the ensuing article.
The recent explosion of generative artificial intelligence tools coincides with a parallel explosion in privacy legislation, both in the U.S. and around the world. Consequently, feeding personal data into generative AI tools and handling personal data in their outputs entails navigating a thicket of data protection obligations. Learn about the three key issues in this complex space here.
As AI technologies grow at an exponential rate, governments are scrambling to determine how to most effectively regulate this new industry. This article provides an overview of current and proposed regulations.
The White House hosted a roundtable on Tuesday on harmful data broker practices as part of the administration’s efforts to protect Americans’ privacy. The event featured the leaders of the nation’s top consumer watchdog agencies, timed to correspond with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s announcement of proposed rules under the Fair Credit Reporting Act to address the business practices of brokers that collect and monetize customer data.
Automation is supposed to make your life easier—but when it comes to mapping your organization’s stores of PI to enable compliance activities, some automated solutions can be more trouble than they’re worth. Find out how to identify a truly beneficial automated data mapping tool and what to avoid in this blog.
If you’re interested in working at Osano, check out our Careers page!
Arlo Gilbert is the CEO & co-founder of Osano. An Austin, Texas native, he has been building software companies for more than 25 years in categories including telecom, payments, procurement, and compliance. In 2005 Arlo invented voice commerce, he has testified before congress on technology issues, and is a frequent speaker on data privacy rights.