GDPR Compliance in the U.S.: What to Know
In 1992, Singapore banned the sale of all chewing gum. But if you...Read Now
The simple, all-in-one data privacy platform
Manage consent for data privacy laws in 50+ countries
Streamline the DSAR workflow
Ensure your customers’ data is in good hands
Gain insights with privacy assessment templates and workflow management
Discover how Osano supports CPRA compliance
Learn about the CCPA and how Osano can help
Achieve compliance with one of the world’s most comprehensive data privacy laws
Don’t let data privacy compliance get in the way of growth
Preserve your competitive edge
Manage data privacy at scale
Expert insights on all things privacy
Subscribe and become a Privacy Insider
Research the most essential privacy topics
We'll scan your website for privacy risk at no cost
The Osano story
Become an Osanian and help us build the future of privacy!
We’re eager to hear from you
No fines, no penalties
Add Osano data privacy ratings and recommendations to your application
Fresh duds for data privacy fans
November 23, 2021
A Massachusetts judge has granted preliminary approval for a class-action settlement based on a hospital's cookie practices.
In the case, the plaintiffs (John Doe and Jane Doe) filed a lawsuit alleging Mass General Brigham Incorporated (and its partners) used web analytics tools to track their behavior on its website domains. The plaintiffs allege Mass General deployed cookies and pixels on their publicly accessible websites, such as www.massgeneral.org or www.brighamandwomens.org, to gather information about them and then sold that information to third parties. The plaintiffs say they never gave the hospital their consent to use tracking tools.
Mass General and its subsidiaries deny the allegations. They don't believe the plaintiffs "have sustained any damages or injuries due to the use of third-party website analytics tools, cookies, pixels and related technologies on the general and publicly accessible Informational Websites," according to a brief. The defendants "maintain that they were prepared to defend vigorously this lawsuit."
But in September 2021, Judge Brian Davis approved a preliminary settlement for $18.4 million. The money will fund payments to class members, as well as attorneys' and administrative fees.
As a refresher for us non-lawyers, a settlement doesn't mean the defendant admits guilt. But they generally agree to the settlement to avoid the costliness of a trial.
Those eligible to join the settlement class must have been the defendants' patients and have visited their public information websites. There are 38 healthcare entities listed, including Brigham and Womeen's Hospital, Dara-Farber Cancer Institute and Wentworth-Douglass Hospital.
On a website built specifically for potential claimants of the Mass General settlement, Angeion, a "settlement administrator," sent notice to those who may be eligible. They have until Dec. 15 to file a claim.
The site, macookiesettlement.com, notes the plaintiffs did not allege a data breach, ransomware attack or that their medical records were disclosed. There is no immediate risk of identity theft, for example.
The final approval hearing for the settlement is slated for Jan. 18, 2022.
Writer at Osano
Writer at Osano
The Osano staff is a diverse team of free thinkers who enjoy working as part of a distributed team with the common goal of working to make a more transparent internet. Occasionally, the team writes under the pen name of our mascot, “Penny, the Privacy Pro.”
Osano is used by the world's most innovative and forward-thinking companies to easily manage and monitor their privacy compliance.
Osano makes it easy. Ready to get serious about data privacy? Choose your plan and get started. All plans come with a 30-day FREE trial!