Find Out How Fast Your Move to Osano Could Be

You can usually import your consent records. It's worth doing, because those records are your evidence. What's portable depends on the export format OneTrust provides and how it stored proof of consent. Bring an export sample to the migration call and we can tell you what carries over intact and what has to be re-collected.

The usual approach is to run both in parallel. Osano goes live on a subset of properties while the incumbent keeps serving the rest, you compare consent capture across both, and only then do you cut over and remove the old tag. Nothing goes dark, and you keep the ability to roll back until you're satisfied.

Osano is built for teams that handle privacy alongside another role and want consent, subject rights, data mapping, assessments, and vendor risk in one place without a services engagement to get started. If your program depends on deep configuration run by a dedicated privacy operations team, compare the two capability by capability before you compare cost. Our OneTrust vs. Osano comparison is a good place to start.

Cost for teams moving off OneTrust is custom. It depends on which products you need, how many sites and domains you run, and your volume of consents and requests. The fair comparison is your OneTrust renewal against a quote for the same scope from us. The migration call is where we build that quote.

No. Some teams move cookie consent first because it's the quickest win. Others do the hard parts first and switch everything on together. Either way, the heavier pieces run side by side. If your driver is a renewal date, we plan backward from that date.

OneTrust contracts commonly renew automatically, so check your notice period when you start planning. Sending notice early keeps a renewal date from forcing your timeline, and your OneTrust setup can stay live until Osano is proven on your site.